# Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-standard-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 47.4.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 44.4 |
| Rank | 193 | 74 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1516 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1481 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1477 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1516 |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1424 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1465 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.