# Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Kimi K3

> Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-standard-vs-kimi-k3
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 35.6.
- Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 59.5 |
| Rank | 193 | 15 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $3 |
| Output $/M | — | $15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
- Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1508 |
| DeepSWE | — | 68.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 44.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1654 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.9% |
| SciCode | — | 59.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 82.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,524 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
- Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 50.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 37.1% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 32% |
| GBAEval | — | 48.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 19% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,165 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
- Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1496 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 60.4% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 93.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 94.5% |
| CritPt | — | 23.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 39% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 26% |
| DTBench | — | 91.2% |
| LMCA | — | 52.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 95% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 157.45 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.1 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
- Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1491 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 72.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 39% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 87.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 87% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
- Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1521 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 50.6% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
- Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 29.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 34.2% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
- Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1466 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1482 |
| LMArena French | — | 1491 |
| LMArena German | — | 1488 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1472 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
- Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1483 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
- Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1494 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
- Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1454 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1488 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2082 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1339 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Kimi K3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.