# Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-standard-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 34.2.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 193 | 94 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.