# Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-large-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 48.9.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 183 | 102 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1479 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1444 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.