# Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs MiMo-V2.5

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-large-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 48.7.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 43.4 |
| Rank | 184 | 93 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1460 |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1468 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1395 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1416 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1434 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | 1445 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2.5 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.