# Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Llama 3.1-70B

> Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-large-vs-llama-3-1-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 13.5.
- Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 184 | 308 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1260 |
| WeirdML | — | 9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 6.9% |
| BALROG | — | 27.9% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1241 |
| DTBench | — | 60% |
| LMCA | — | 14.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.92 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1252 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 21% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 36.7% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1209 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 44.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 65.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| MMLU | — | 80.1% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1219 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1215 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1234 |
| LMArena French | — | 1261 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1140 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1253 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1231 |
| IFEval | — | 82.1% |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | 1241 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1261 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1232 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1256 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 784 |
| WildBench | — | 75.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 3.1-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.