# Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Llama 2-13B

> Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-large-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 48.9 to 30.0.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 183 | 304 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1062 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1051 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 105.8 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)
- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1001 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1055 |
| LMArena French | — | 1043 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1086 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1046 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Llama 2-13B?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 2-13B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.