# Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok Build 0.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-build-0-1-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 50.2% for Grok Build 0.1 and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 216 | 232 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $2 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | 0% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok Build 0.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

### Is Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.