# Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-build-0-1-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 32.2.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 216 | 72 |
| Context | 256K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $2 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | 45.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | 9.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |

## Knowledge

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |

## Multimodal

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

### Is Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.