# Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-build-0-1-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 25.9.

## Snapshot

| | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 216 | 181 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $1 | — |
| Output $/M | $2 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |

## Math

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |

## Multilingual

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.