# Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

> Grok Build 0.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#216); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-build-0-1-vs-qwen2-5-coder
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | — |
| Rank | 216 | — |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $1 | — |
| Output $/M | $2 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |

## Math

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Grok Build 0.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#216); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.