# Grok Build 0.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-build-0-1-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 19.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 9.1% for Grok Build 0.1 and 0.6% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- Grok Build 0.1 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 216 | 196 |
| Context | 256K | 205K |
| Input $/M | $1 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $2 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | 47% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | 0% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |

## Reasoning

- Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | 0.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |

## Math

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |

## Knowledge

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1441 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1405 |

## Long Context

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1412 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok Build 0.1 better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

### Is Grok Build 0.1 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok Build 0.1 does, with 256K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.