# Grok Build 0.1 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-build-0-1-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 21.3.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.8 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 214 | 102 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $1 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $2 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |

## Math

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1479 |

## Multilingual

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1444 |

## Long Context

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok Build 0.1 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

### Is Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.5 vs 43.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.