# Grok Build 0.1 vs Kimi K3

> Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index. Grok Build 0.1 costs 4.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-build-0-1-vs-kimi-k3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 31.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GBAEval: 2.4% for Grok Build 0.1 and 48.3% for Kimi K3.
- Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Kimi K3.
- Kimi K3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.8 | 59.5 |
| Rank | 214 | 12 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $1 | $3 |
| Output $/M | $2 | $15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)
- Kimi K3: 60.6 (#8)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | 59.5% |
| DeepSWE | — | 68.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 44.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1659 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 82.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1509 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,524 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)
- Kimi K3: 41.8 (#19)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | 48.3% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 50.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 37.1% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 32% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 19% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,165 |

## Reasoning

- Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)
- Kimi K3: 63.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | 23.4% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 60.4% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 93.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 94.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 39% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1495 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 26% |
| DTBench | — | 91.2% |
| LMCA | — | 52.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 95% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 157.68 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.1 |

## Math

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K3: 74.0 (#13)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 72.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 39% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 87.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 87% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1493 |

## Knowledge

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K3: 63.2 (#19)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 50.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1520 |

## Multimodal

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K3: 38.4 (#58)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 29.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 34.2% |

## Multilingual

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K3: 56.5 (#20)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1528 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1478 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K3: 77.8 (#13)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1481 |

## Long Context

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K3: 45.8 (#27)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1494 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok Build 0.1: —
- Kimi K3: 76.7 (#4)

| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1452 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2082 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1488 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index. Grok Build 0.1 costs 4.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K3?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Kimi K3 lists at $3 and $15.

### Is Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.6 versus 42.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Kimi K3 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.