# Grok 4 Fast vs Qwen2-72B

> Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-fast-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 42.9% for Grok 4 Fast and 11.3% for Qwen2-72B.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 167 | 300 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)
- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 42.9% | 11.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1429 | 1196 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1159 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)
- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 15.7% | — |
| Cybench | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)
- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1412 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.2 | 125.28 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 66.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 48.5% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.5 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)
- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1411 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 19.7% | — |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)
- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1396 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1431 | 1170 |
| LMArena German | 1383 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1357 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1389 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | 1169 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)
- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1192 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)
- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1196 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4 Fast better than Qwen2-72B?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4 Fast or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Grok 4 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Qwen2-72B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.