# Grok 4 Fast vs Qwen-14B

> Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-fast-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4 Fast leads 60.2 to 27.8.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 164 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1429 | 1072 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1160 | — |
| WeirdML | 42.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 15.7% | — |
| Cybench | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.21 | 112.8 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 66.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 48.5% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | 60.5 | — |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 19.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1411 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106)
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1397 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1458 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1414 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116)
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1388 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1029 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4 Fast better than Qwen-14B?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4 Fast or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Grok 4 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.