# Grok 4 Fast vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-fast-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 32.3.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 164 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1160 | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | 1429 | 1538 |
| WeirdML | 42.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 15.7% | — |
| Cybench | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 1511 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 66.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 48.5% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.21 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.5 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1497 |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1411 | 1548 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 19.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4 Fast: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1397 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1458 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1414 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1388 | 1490 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1500 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1463 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4 Fast better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4 Fast or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.