# Grok 4 Fast vs Mercury

> Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-fast-vs-mercury
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 5 categories and Mercury in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 38.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 66.1% for Grok 4 Fast and 21.6% for Mercury.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 37.6 |
| Rank | 167 | 199 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)
- Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1429 | 1322 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1159 | — |
| WeirdML | 42.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 15.7% | — |
| Cybench | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)
- Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 66.1% | 21.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1412 | 1285 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 48.5% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.2 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.5 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 19.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1411 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)
- Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1396 | 1260 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | — |
| LMArena French | 1431 | — |
| LMArena German | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)
- Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1239 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)
- Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1266 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)
- Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1191 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1282 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4 Fast better than Mercury?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4 Fast or Mercury better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Mercury share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.