# Grok 4.7 vs Yi-34B

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-yi-34b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 34.3.
- Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 27.4 |
| Rank | 56 | 325 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Yi-34B: 31.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1112 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Yi-34B: 20.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1104 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.28 |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Yi-34B: 19.8 (#277)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1114 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Yi-34B: 7.5 (#304)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Yi-34B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Yi-34B: 29.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1175 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1050 |
| LMArena French | — | 1080 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Yi-34B: 56.4 (#269)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1091 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Yi-34B: 33.2 (#259)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1094 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Yi-34B: 34.3 (#268)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1113 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Yi-34B?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Yi-34B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.