# Grok 4.7 vs Wizardlm 70b

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 34.9.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 56 | 245 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1081 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1079 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1116 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1108 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.