# Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 36.2.
- Both cost about the same: $2 input and $6 output per million tokens.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 56 | 186 |
| Context | 500K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | 1275 |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1413 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1372 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1364 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1337 |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1367 |
| LMArena French | — | 1394 |
| LMArena German | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1356 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1365 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.