# Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 6 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 57.4% for Grok 4.7 and 45.5% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 500K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 56 | 66 |
| Context | 500K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 57.4% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | 74.8% |
| CritPt | 17.7% | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1460 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.39 |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1510 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1459 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 500K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.