# Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 55× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 27.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 76.8% for Grok 4.7 and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 500K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 56 | 152 |
| Context | 500K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1393 | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 55× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 500K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.