# Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 32.0.
- Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 500K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 56 | 103 |
| Context | 500K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1393 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 500K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.