# Grok 4.7 vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-qwen1-5-4b-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.0 to 23.8.
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 37 | 322 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 999 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 976 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 49.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1026 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | 980 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1024 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 978 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 988 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 977 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.