# Grok 4.7 vs Phi-4

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 34× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-phi-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 40.7.
- Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 56 | 269 |
| Context | 500K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.07 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $0.14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1231 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 30.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: —
- Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1220 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.43 |
| LiveBench | — | 41.6% |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1246 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 64.9% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1203 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Phi-4: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1211 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1209 |
| LMArena French | — | 1223 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1234 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1201 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.4% |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1217 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1206 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Phi-4?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 34× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Phi-4 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Phi-4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.