# Grok 4.7 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 50.4.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 56 | 168 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1346 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1322 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1305 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1307 |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1309 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.