# Grok 4.7 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 42.3.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 56 | 248 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1210 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1208 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1208 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1221 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.