# Grok 4.7 vs o1

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-o1
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and o1 in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.7 leads 57.8 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 53% for Grok 4.7 and 14.7% for o1.
- Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $60 for o1.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 200K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 37 | 143 |
| Context | 500K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $15 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
- o1: 46.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 1367 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
- o1: 24.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
- o1: 27.9 (#111)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | 15% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 1371 |
| DTBench | 96% | 74.7% |
| LMCA | 49.4% | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | 141.91 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
- o1: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
- o1: 41.5 (#110)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | 76.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | 41.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | 1361 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
- o1: 34.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
- o1: 48.6 (#142)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | 1345 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
- o1: 74.8 (#86)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
- o1: 50.3 (#9)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
- o1: 55.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than o1?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or o1?

Grok 4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; o1 lists at $15 and $60.

### Is Grok 4.7 or o1 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 46.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and o1 share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.