# Grok 4.7 vs o1-mini

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-o1-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 8.9.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 33.7 |
| Rank | 56 | 230 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1362 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: —
- o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- o1-mini: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1283 |
| LMArena French | — | 1292 |
| LMArena German | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1302 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1321 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than o1-mini?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or o1-mini better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and o1-mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.