# Grok 4.7 vs Mistral Small 3.1

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.1 costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-mistral-small-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 37.2.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper at $0.35 / $0.56 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Small 3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 56 | 263 |
| Context | 500K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $0.56 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1309 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1278 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.48 |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1261 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.9% |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.8% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1258 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 61% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39.2% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1136 |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1263 |
| LMArena French | — | 1270 |
| LMArena German | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1283 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1264 |
| IFEval | — | 75% |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1300 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1278 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1253 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | 761 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1270 |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.1 costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Mistral Small 3.1?

Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.