# Grok 4.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-mistral-medium-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 10.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 76.8% for Grok 4.7 and 6.5% for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 56 | 260 |
| Context | 500K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $2 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | 6.5% |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1393 | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | 1476 |
| LMArena Text | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.