# Grok 4.7 vs Ministral 8B

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 30× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-ministral-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Ministral 8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 39.8.
- Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 128K.
- Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 27.8 |
| Rank | 56 | 321 |
| Context | 500K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $0.10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1202 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: —
- Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 11.1% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1191 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 45.7% |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1188 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.9% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1170 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Ministral 8B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1165 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1193 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1195 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1161 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1212 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1191 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1175 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1166 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Ministral 8B?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 30× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Ministral 8B?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Ministral 8B better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Ministral 8B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.