# Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 42.7.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 56 | 91 |
| Context | 500K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1467 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1445 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1432 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1449 |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1469 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1412 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 42.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.