# Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 57.8% for Grok 4.7 and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 37 | 138 |
| Context | 500K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 57.8% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 1443 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 18% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 1420 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 49.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | 1429 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | 1420 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.