# Grok 4.7 vs Llama 3-70B

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.7 leads 41.1 to 12.0.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 28.5 |
| Rank | 56 | 317 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1206 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: —
- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1195 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.91 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Llama 3-70B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1114 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1159 |
| LMArena French | — | 1231 |
| LMArena German | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1194 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1223 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Llama 3-70B?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Llama 3-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.