# Grok 4.7 vs Llama 13b

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.0 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 37 | 348 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 683 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 728 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | 100.58 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 49.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 838 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | — |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 753 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Llama 13b?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Llama 13b better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Llama 13b share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.