# Grok 4.7 vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 45.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 58.0 to 38.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 38% for Grok 4.7 and 20% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 45.8 |
| Rank | 37 | 70 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | 1322 |
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 1454 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 1428 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 49.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1429 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | 1439 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | 1406 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1330 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1414 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 45.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.