# Grok 4.7 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 38.8.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 37 | 114 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 1390 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 1399 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 49.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1384 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.