# Grok 4.7 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-7-vs-hunyuan-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 48.9.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 38.0 |
| Rank | 56 | 183 |
| Context | 500K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1307 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1286 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1281 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1276 |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1266 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1277 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1342 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1284 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.7 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.7 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.