# Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2

> Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index. Muse Spark 1.2 costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-6-vs-muse-spark-1-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 30

## Summary

- They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 6 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 67.0 to 46.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is APEX-Agents: 65.3% for Grok 4.6 and 36.4% for Muse Spark 1.2.
- Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.6.
- Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 500K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 56.9 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 21 | 48 |
| Context | 500K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $4.25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 67.5% | 54.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1617 | 1533 |
| FrontierSWE | 25.3% | 12% |
| SciCode | 56.5% | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | 67.3% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | 1495 |
| FrontierCode | 48% | — |
| CursorBench | 41.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,508 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 65.3% | 36.4% |
| GDP.pdf | 17.2% | 16% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 9,047 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 75.9% | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80% | 79.2% |
| CritPt | 19.7% | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1486 |
| DTBench | 97.3% | 94.7% |
| LMCA | 48.5% | 48.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.44 | 154.87 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 67.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 87.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 30.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 51% | 43% |
| LMArena Math | 1423 | 1471 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 66% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 99.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 49.3% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1467 | 1480 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | 1305 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.2% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 40% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1452 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1478 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1480 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1513 |
| LMArena Russian | 1422 | 1487 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1404 | 1498 |
| LMArena German | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1376 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1397 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1431 | 1461 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1454 | 1475 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1482 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1428 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1494 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.6 better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index. Muse Spark 1.2 costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Grok 4.6 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.6 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 49.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.