# Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

> Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-5-vs-kimi-k2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.5 scores higher in 9 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.1 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 70% for Grok 4.5 and 26.3% for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025).
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper at $0.57 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.5.
- Grok 4.5 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 55.0 | 41.2 |
| Rank | 25 | 140 |
| Context | 500K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.57 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $2.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.4% | 42.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1474 | 1399 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,309 | 597.5 |
| DeepSWE | 53.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 63.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 59.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1553 | — |
| SciCode | 54.1% | — |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 35.7% |
| APEX-Agents | 56.2% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 59.1% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 47.9% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 23.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 65.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1213 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 59.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,887 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 70% | 26.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 83.5% | 64.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1462 | 1384 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.92 | 146.01 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 52.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 87.2% | — |
| CritPt | 15.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 36% | — |
| DTBench | 96.5% | — |
| LMCA | 45.2% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 74.4% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.2 |

## Math

- Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1459 | 1397 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 65.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1466 | 1365 |
| GPQA Diamond | 93.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 48.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 20.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65.3% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 27.3% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 22.5% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1452 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1379 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1387 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | 1404 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1448 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1386 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1446 | 1348 |
| IFEval | — | 85% |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1353 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.6% |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1380 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1442 | 1350 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1579 | 1666 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1371 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 85.6% |
| WildBench | — | 86.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.5 better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper. It lists at $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Grok 4.5 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.5 or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.5 does, with 500K tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.5 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.