# Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-3-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multimodal, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 41.2 to 31.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 55.2% for Grok 4.3 and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.3.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 80 | 66 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.3: 41.3 (#117)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 47.3% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1415 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1357 | — |
| WeirdML | 49.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 944.17 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.3: 27.6 (#93)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| GDP.pdf | 8% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1165 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 35.26 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.3: 34.9 (#60)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 55.2% | 74.8% |
| CritPt | 8% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1397 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 90.7% | 84% |
| LMCA | 38.3% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.13 | 147.39 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.3: 45.8 (#60)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 42.8% | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1388 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 14.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 11% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#57)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.8% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#96)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1231 | 1281 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.3: 50.7 (#114)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1385 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1423 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1412 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1379 | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | 1357 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1399 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1402 | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.3: 72.3 (#135)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#118)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1393 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.3: 58.6 (#112)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1380 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1406 | 1459 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1075 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.3 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

### Is Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.3 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.