# Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Flash costs 3.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-3-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 42.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 42.8% for Grok 4.3 and 22.5% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.3.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 80 | 176 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.3: 41.3 (#117)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 944.17 | 326.4 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1357 | — |
| SciCode | 47.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 49.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1415 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.3: 27.6 (#93)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 8% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1165 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 35.26 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.3: 34.9 (#60)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | 20% |
| DTBench | 90.7% | 77.1% |
| LMCA | 38.3% | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.13 | 143.26 |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 55.2% | — |
| CritPt | 8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1397 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.3: 45.8 (#60)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 42.8% | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 14.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 11% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1388 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#57)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.8% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.2% | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#96)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1231 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.3: 50.7 (#114)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1423 | — |
| LMArena French | 1412 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1402 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.3: 72.3 (#135)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#118)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1393 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.3: 58.6 (#112)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1380 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1075 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1406 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.3 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Flash costs 3.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.