# Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Wizardlm 13b

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-20-multi-agent-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 65 | 274 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1035 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Wizardlm 13b?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.