# Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-20-multi-agent-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 34.2.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 65 | 293 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1130 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
- Qwen1.5-32B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1101 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen1.5-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.