# Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-20-multi-agent-vs-nova-2-0-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 42.4 to 21.7.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 45.5 | 32.8 |
| Rank | 62 | 241 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1458 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1430 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.