# Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs MiniMax-M2.7

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-20-multi-agent-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 42.4 to 19.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and 24.7% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 45.5 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 62 | 188 |
| Context | 1M | 205K |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1458 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | 24.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1422 |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.84 |

## Math

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1443 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)
- MiniMax-M2.7: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1439 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1422 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1261 |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1404 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1430 | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1404 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1413 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.