# Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 45.5 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-20-multi-agent-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 6 categories and Grok 4.7 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 42.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and 76.8% for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 500K.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 45.5 | 46.6 |
| Rank | 62 | 56 |
| Context | 1M | 500K |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)
- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1458 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
- Grok 4.7: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)
- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | 76.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1409 |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |

## Math

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)
- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1393 |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)
- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1413 |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)
- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)
- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)
- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)
- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1430 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)
- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 45.5 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 500K.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Grok 4.7 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.