# Grok 4.1 vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Grok 4.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#135); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-1-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 40.1 to 33.4.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 135 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | — |

## Math

- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1464 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1438 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.1 better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Grok 4.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#135); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Grok 4.1 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.